🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to protect females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries